The Moon / Brad Guth
This is not another effort at discrediting others, so much as it's about doing what's right with exploiting our complex mineral and raw element treasure-trove moon.
Obviously we don't have to do a damn thing about managing tidal surges, seismic issues or figuring out where our moon ever came from in the first place, as I'm certain there were any number of random happenstance events taking place at the time and especially prior to our planet getting its seasonal tilt, another ocean basin, the antipode of Antarctica and having acquired the moon kinda all at once.
Monday, June 24, 2013
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Guth Venus / GuthVenus
GuthVenus
Focus yourself within a 10% area, situated one third up, roughly center:
-->http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
Indeed Venus is a hot planet, though not as entirely heated from the outside, but instead from the inside out.
Those extremely reflective clouds are not only thick and robust and obviously somewhat acidic, as well as getting cryogenic (worse than icy) cold above 60 km and especially getting extra cryogenic by way of their unavoidable season of nighttime, but they otherwise do tend to insulate whatever geothermal plus the little amount of solar energy that gets through, which is actually quite minimal compared to the all-inclusive 20.5 watts/m2 of global energy escaping, whereas the solar contributed factor of surface heating could be as little as a fourth or roughly an average of 5 watts/m2 because, the daytime surface simply doesn't get all that much illumination (a few percent) of the solar 2650 w/m2 spectrum to work with, and most of that cloud filtered influx isn't IR.
In other words, the vast bulk of solar energy gets reflected, and much of whatever continues inward is getting recycled within the thick layers of those clouds that continually recirculate solar energy in much the same fashion as our oceans recirculate and transport solar energy. Most of the incoming recirculation of IR energy gets moderated or diverted by the S8 layer acting somewhat like a personal protection fire blanket, below which are those mostly CO2 acidic clouds and finally a 5~10 km depth as a layer of mist or fog area of semitransparent atmosphere. Below the acidic fog and mist of micro-droplets that never reach the surface, is where the mostly buoyant and otherwise clear atmosphere as dominated by CO2 is relatively calm and basically inert, though getting hotter as you approach the active surface where that atmosphere is continually replenished and where most of the heat is coming from.
Focus yourself within a 10% area, situated one third up, roughly center:
-->http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
Indeed Venus is a hot planet, though not as entirely heated from the outside, but instead from the inside out.
Those extremely reflective clouds are not only thick and robust and obviously somewhat acidic, as well as getting cryogenic (worse than icy) cold above 60 km and especially getting extra cryogenic by way of their unavoidable season of nighttime, but they otherwise do tend to insulate whatever geothermal plus the little amount of solar energy that gets through, which is actually quite minimal compared to the all-inclusive 20.5 watts/m2 of global energy escaping, whereas the solar contributed factor of surface heating could be as little as a fourth or roughly an average of 5 watts/m2 because, the daytime surface simply doesn't get all that much illumination (a few percent) of the solar 2650 w/m2 spectrum to work with, and most of that cloud filtered influx isn't IR.
In other words, the vast bulk of solar energy gets reflected, and much of whatever continues inward is getting recycled within the thick layers of those clouds that continually recirculate solar energy in much the same fashion as our oceans recirculate and transport solar energy. Most of the incoming recirculation of IR energy gets moderated or diverted by the S8 layer acting somewhat like a personal protection fire blanket, below which are those mostly CO2 acidic clouds and finally a 5~10 km depth as a layer of mist or fog area of semitransparent atmosphere. Below the acidic fog and mist of micro-droplets that never reach the surface, is where the mostly buoyant and otherwise clear atmosphere as dominated by CO2 is relatively calm and basically inert, though getting hotter as you approach the active surface where that atmosphere is continually replenished and where most of the heat is coming from.
Just a standard 10X view of GuthVenus
The small image is extracted as a direct derivative from the GIF format of the Magellan archived image, as obtained from just one of many official radar obtained images.
If you can't identify anything unusual in this image, then the good news is that you automatically qualify for state and federal benefits for the blind/disabled.
Of course you can always go to the original image that's offering those blocky pixel resolutions of 225 meters, and not bother to enlarge/zoom-in with anything capable of delivering the best quality image, which is actually what I did at first and used such large resolution pixels in order to estimate the relative size of items.
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
GuthVenus index
Brad Guth - Venus / 1-253-8576061
Page access: http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
This blog page is "Guth Venus"(GuthVenus), or at least covering a small but intriguing bit of hot surface area within the lower third and center portion of but only one Magellan mission image, that's worth the effort to see for yourself what this extremely nearby planet Venus has to offer. You can most certainly accomplish your own digital resample/enlargement, or use whatever I've accomplished with the relatively outdated photo software at my disposal. This digital image resampling/enlargement process is not of any weird voodoo, nor is it capable of randomly faking or introducing anything that isn't basically there to begin with, as my usual mainstream gauntlet of critics has so often suggested, including those of NASA as of December 2000 we not buying into any of this, perhaps because it was a closed and thereby unfunded aspect of history that can never get revised. (silly me for thinking otherwise)
"Magellan radar image of lava channels north of Ovda Regio, Venus. This image shows the Lo Shen Valles, a system of channels and large collapsed source areas. This left-looking image from cycle 1 forms the left side of a stereo pair with the cycle 2 right-looking image C1-15S095;201. (Magellan C1-MIDR 15S095;1,framelet 18)" http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
An assortment of Magellan thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel): http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
This following processed (not doctored) view is actually providing a terrific derivative composite that's utilizing three full frames worth of 75 meter/pixel resolution images as having been stacked and averaged for delivering the best compromise, whereas each of those original SAR images having contributed 4x radar scans per pixel is what's making these GIF monochrome composite pixels about as truth-worthy as 36 averaged radar looks or confirming scans per 225 meter pixel can possibly get. The most interesting area of what's offering a look-see at such a highly complex area of perfectly natural terrain as well as potentially a little too much artificial considerations of oddly symmetrical geometries as rather unexpected items that could even suggest a level of rational infrastructure, is all contained within roughly a 10% area that's a third up from the bottom and roughly center. For best viewing results you will need a basic photo enlarging utility, which is different than merely zooming in by using a screen magnifier or your generic Ctrl+++ option, though most modern-day browsers including iPhone and Safari will accomplish this task of zooming in with little or no digital resampling or image processing expertise required of yourself. Obviously we have resolution limitations, but only problematic for items smaller than 75 meters.
If you'd care to submit a revised image from whatever digital image zoom/enlargement via IrfanView, PhotoZoom or some other software that you've selected as your best effort, please go right ahead and do so. I'll otherwise recommend a few user-friendly alternatives that even a dysfunctional 5th grader can manage, but you need not fear that I'll reject your efforts unless you've made your closed mindset negative intentions obvious. Remember that you do not have to process the entire image, but instead just focus upon the 10% portion, although either way the results will always turn out exactly the same because, the original GIF or even its JPG 1:1 version never changes a damn thing, at least not on its own.
Photo view/enlarge via IrfanView
http://www.irfanview.com/
PhotoZoom Pro (mac and pc)
http://www.benvista.com/main/content/content.php?page=downloads
This image is just offering your basic 10X resampling/enlarging effort, as I've done so many times in basic PhotoShop, along with the unsharp mask filter set as having 4 pixels rounded off and 200% sharpening or intensifying. Other photo enlargement or zoom-in methods can likely accomplish this automatically and as well or even better, and otherwise so easily or seamlessly accomplished that even dysfunctional 5th graders can manage. On most PCs are those screen magnifiers and always the Ctrl+ + + keys that'll gets you in for a closer or enlarged look-see. The 1:1 image allows you to easily count individual pixels in order to estimate those various dimensional aspects as based upon 225 meters per pixel.
If you elect to stick with the raw 1:1 image format and of its 225 m/pixel resolution (as I certainly did at first), or worse insist upon excluding and/or ignoring whatever's under a km per any given dimension, then perhaps you need not bother yourself trying to interpret anything outside of those three extremely large protruding hot rocks. There's also a whole other complex realm of image interpreting expertise when its a radar(SAR) obtained format to begin with, but again you'll need to lose your negative or closed naysay mindset in order to become intelligent enough to start with, because most naysayers are usually in such a profound status-quo state of denial that they don't even want to accept this is even an image of the planet Venus.
I have many other wordy pages and loads of hard and soft numbers pertaining to the physics and science of this extremely nearby and toasty planet, plus a few other images published elsewhere that I can retrieve or revise from scratch and submit for whatever it's worth. However, I do not expect to have identified or interpreted everything as correctly, as may otherwise be possible to improve upon by those having equal or better observationology expertise. So by all means, your interpretation could be more correct, and I would give full credits to those willing to seriously take on this risky business that suggesting there has been some other form of intelligent life existing/coexisting on the plant Venus.
In Google Groups (Usenet/newsgroups and G+) I go by the names of Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” (not related to Alan Guth)
These links are ofered on behalf of Hank Kroll (a close family associate) that also thinks a little outside the box, and like myself can manage to deductively connect pixels and dots that others seem blind and/or dead closed mindset oblivious to.
http://www.guarddogbooks.com
From time to time Google Groups or G+ becomes extra sluggish and/or dysfunctional (especially within browsers other than Chrome), often worse at times after I've contributed something new or even old. It seems to be another Google G+ work in progress; sorry about that. Google Groups+(G+) version of Usenet/newsgroups seems to get rather broken or dysfunctional, as having been accepting our contributions like a terrific vortex that's sucking everything in, but then it’s not always quick at updating itself in order to properly display our replies, as though it has turned into a somewhat dysfunctional Usenet/newsgroup black hole. Once again, and typically shortly after having posted alternative links to the likes of earthquake prediction pages, such as those of E.D.G. eq-forecasting, everything comes down to a halt. At least the index updating function of Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups is suddenly dysfunctional whenever disclosing creditable research as having almost anything to do with our moon.
-
alt.astronomy, sci.astro.ccd-imaging, alt.news-media, alt.planets.venus, alt.journalism
“Guth Venus / Brad Guth and the hot planet 2.02”
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/86e88fbd2a533110?hl=en#
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.ccd-imaging/browse_frm/thread/47eab5a34790be03?hl=en#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Brad Guth / Blog and Google document pages:
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
Page access: http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
This blog page is "Guth Venus"(GuthVenus), or at least covering a small but intriguing bit of hot surface area within the lower third and center portion of but only one Magellan mission image, that's worth the effort to see for yourself what this extremely nearby planet Venus has to offer. You can most certainly accomplish your own digital resample/enlargement, or use whatever I've accomplished with the relatively outdated photo software at my disposal. This digital image resampling/enlargement process is not of any weird voodoo, nor is it capable of randomly faking or introducing anything that isn't basically there to begin with, as my usual mainstream gauntlet of critics has so often suggested, including those of NASA as of December 2000 we not buying into any of this, perhaps because it was a closed and thereby unfunded aspect of history that can never get revised. (silly me for thinking otherwise)
"Magellan radar image of lava channels north of Ovda Regio, Venus. This image shows the Lo Shen Valles, a system of channels and large collapsed source areas. This left-looking image from cycle 1 forms the left side of a stereo pair with the cycle 2 right-looking image C1-15S095;201. (Magellan C1-MIDR 15S095;1,framelet 18)" http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
An assortment of Magellan thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel): http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
This following processed (not doctored) view is actually providing a terrific derivative composite that's utilizing three full frames worth of 75 meter/pixel resolution images as having been stacked and averaged for delivering the best compromise, whereas each of those original SAR images having contributed 4x radar scans per pixel is what's making these GIF monochrome composite pixels about as truth-worthy as 36 averaged radar looks or confirming scans per 225 meter pixel can possibly get. The most interesting area of what's offering a look-see at such a highly complex area of perfectly natural terrain as well as potentially a little too much artificial considerations of oddly symmetrical geometries as rather unexpected items that could even suggest a level of rational infrastructure, is all contained within roughly a 10% area that's a third up from the bottom and roughly center. For best viewing results you will need a basic photo enlarging utility, which is different than merely zooming in by using a screen magnifier or your generic Ctrl+++ option, though most modern-day browsers including iPhone and Safari will accomplish this task of zooming in with little or no digital resampling or image processing expertise required of yourself. Obviously we have resolution limitations, but only problematic for items smaller than 75 meters.
If you'd care to submit a revised image from whatever digital image zoom/enlargement via IrfanView, PhotoZoom or some other software that you've selected as your best effort, please go right ahead and do so. I'll otherwise recommend a few user-friendly alternatives that even a dysfunctional 5th grader can manage, but you need not fear that I'll reject your efforts unless you've made your closed mindset negative intentions obvious. Remember that you do not have to process the entire image, but instead just focus upon the 10% portion, although either way the results will always turn out exactly the same because, the original GIF or even its JPG 1:1 version never changes a damn thing, at least not on its own.
Photo view/enlarge via IrfanView
http://www.irfanview.com/
PhotoZoom Pro (mac and pc)
http://www.benvista.com/main/content/content.php?page=downloads
This image is just offering your basic 10X resampling/enlarging effort, as I've done so many times in basic PhotoShop, along with the unsharp mask filter set as having 4 pixels rounded off and 200% sharpening or intensifying. Other photo enlargement or zoom-in methods can likely accomplish this automatically and as well or even better, and otherwise so easily or seamlessly accomplished that even dysfunctional 5th graders can manage. On most PCs are those screen magnifiers and always the Ctrl+ + + keys that'll gets you in for a closer or enlarged look-see. The 1:1 image allows you to easily count individual pixels in order to estimate those various dimensional aspects as based upon 225 meters per pixel.
If you elect to stick with the raw 1:1 image format and of its 225 m/pixel resolution (as I certainly did at first), or worse insist upon excluding and/or ignoring whatever's under a km per any given dimension, then perhaps you need not bother yourself trying to interpret anything outside of those three extremely large protruding hot rocks. There's also a whole other complex realm of image interpreting expertise when its a radar(SAR) obtained format to begin with, but again you'll need to lose your negative or closed naysay mindset in order to become intelligent enough to start with, because most naysayers are usually in such a profound status-quo state of denial that they don't even want to accept this is even an image of the planet Venus.
I have many other wordy pages and loads of hard and soft numbers pertaining to the physics and science of this extremely nearby and toasty planet, plus a few other images published elsewhere that I can retrieve or revise from scratch and submit for whatever it's worth. However, I do not expect to have identified or interpreted everything as correctly, as may otherwise be possible to improve upon by those having equal or better observationology expertise. So by all means, your interpretation could be more correct, and I would give full credits to those willing to seriously take on this risky business that suggesting there has been some other form of intelligent life existing/coexisting on the plant Venus.
In Google Groups (Usenet/newsgroups and G+) I go by the names of Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” (not related to Alan Guth)
These links are ofered on behalf of Hank Kroll (a close family associate) that also thinks a little outside the box, and like myself can manage to deductively connect pixels and dots that others seem blind and/or dead closed mindset oblivious to.
http://www.guarddogbooks.com
From time to time Google Groups or G+ becomes extra sluggish and/or dysfunctional (especially within browsers other than Chrome), often worse at times after I've contributed something new or even old. It seems to be another Google G+ work in progress; sorry about that. Google Groups+(G+) version of Usenet/newsgroups seems to get rather broken or dysfunctional, as having been accepting our contributions like a terrific vortex that's sucking everything in, but then it’s not always quick at updating itself in order to properly display our replies, as though it has turned into a somewhat dysfunctional Usenet/newsgroup black hole. Once again, and typically shortly after having posted alternative links to the likes of earthquake prediction pages, such as those of E.D.G. eq-forecasting, everything comes down to a halt. At least the index updating function of Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups is suddenly dysfunctional whenever disclosing creditable research as having almost anything to do with our moon.
Since my alternative “Guth Usenet” and the newest "Google Usenet" accounts are still up and working like a charm, as public accessible for anyone to contribute and read whatever updates, must mean that those individuals or special interest groups (usually faith-based and redneck ZNR/GOP FUD-master types) in charge of whatever the general public and media get to read of our public Usenet/newsgroups as once again being intentionally terminated or simply as having been diverted and/or hacked to death in order to accomplish their primary task of mainstream media damage-control. They also use a tactic of simply piling on loads of worthless topics and otherwise made as nasty and X-rated as possible.
At least within my Usenet/newsgroups we can still clean up, exclude and even block those topics contributed by such FUD-masters.
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
At least within my Usenet/newsgroups we can still clean up, exclude and even block those topics contributed by such FUD-masters.
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
Obviously it has not been any local problem with my computer or that of its crappy Cenrtylink DSL provider, and obviously it’s not any Google Groups glitch if my personal stuff including “Guth Usenet” and "Google Usenet" are still working like a charm while all other public and moderated newsgroup stuff has tanked, or slowed to a crawl by G+. Clearly Google Groups and especially Groups+(G+) version of accessing Usenet/newsgroups has from time to time been further compromised and/or is being intentionally topic/author stalked and possibly hacked to death in order to keep as many K-12s and even adults as diverted or as far away as possible.
I had only recently replaced the “uk.media.newspapers” newsgroup with “sci.astro.ccd-imaging”, so perhaps that’s where things got all screwed up, because that newsgroup had summarily died with my topic being stuck at the top of its newsgroup page. Otherwise it’s not my fault that my Google Groups account had once been showing 37000+ views of my topics and replies per week and thereby could be causing such problems, unless my topics and other replies were causing too much drain on the local server bandwidth. Apparently we’ve gotten too close to the Google/NOVA Usenet event horizon, because we’re sucked into its black hole where our stuff goes in, but then noting comes back out.
-
alt.astronomy, sci.astro.ccd-imaging, alt.news-media, alt.planets.venus, alt.journalism
“Guth Venus / Brad Guth and the hot planet 2.02”
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/86e88fbd2a533110?hl=en#
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.ccd-imaging/browse_frm/thread/47eab5a34790be03?hl=en#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Brad Guth / Blog and Google document pages:
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Google Groups+ Usenet/newsgroups
The internet cloud can be unfriendly, and as NO FLY worthy as it gets.
The Sirius Documentary © 2013
Google Groups Usenet Newsgroups is dysfunctional because:
Did I just break our Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups?
Once again, shortly after having posted alternative links to earthquake prediction pages, such as those of E.D.G. eq-forecasting, everything comes down to a halt. At least the index updating function of Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups is dysfunctional.
Sirius stars are currently MIA, as in having been terminated
by the mainstream status-quo.
We seem to have a kill-switch
gap, whereas individuals like myself do not have the same access and freedom of
switching off those topics and authors that piss me off. I want my switch.
As of lately, Wikipedia as
well as several other search links as to those Sirius stars seem to be missing
in action. Searching for
the public science/astronomy material on those Sirius stars, and instead we get
the following:
"Oops! Google Chrome could not find"
"Oops! Google Chrome could not find"
Other than my having included
the mention of Sirius within my recent topics and replies, what's the problem?
Just because those Sirius
stars will get a lot closer before moving off, and possibly Sirius(b) could
pull enough of Sirius(a) plasma to become problematic, is just what binary
stars do (make that trinary if you'd care to include our sun). Of course
if Sirius(b) goes supernova from this distance and closing fast at 7.5 km/sec,
it is most certainly not going to do our planet a whole lot of good.
No telling what the
considerable Sirius Oort cloud of debris and asteroids might have for us, not
to mention its far flung planets.
Pretty much any topic as offering a webpage as having the
context include the word/name Sirius, has been Google and Bing search
terminated. It’s as though our
mainstream media cops are doing everything they can muster at keeping their
status-quo about those Sirius stars from being modified by any outsider like
Greer, because once the door of revising the Bilderberg/oligarch version is
broken open, could allow a flood of other disclosures and revisions.
Has this Sirius documentary become a conspiracy wrapped in a conspiracy?
The Sirius Documentary © 2013
“This website is the
home for the Sirius Documentary. A revolutionary
documentary about the existence of information and technology not available to
the general public”
Apparently
Dr. Steven Greer has been busy creating a wee little problem for the rest of
us.
This is highly reminiscent of how my GuthVenus topics get
treated as though taboo/nondisclosure rated, and this fully proves how fast and
extensive the moderation of our public internet and Usenet/newsgroups can get
diverted and/or terminated at the flip of a switch.
“whoever controls
the past, controls the future” / 1984 George Orwell
"A new scientific
truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the
light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation
grows up that is familiar with it." / Max Planck
Brad Guth,
Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”, GuthVenus
As is, many internet and especially intranet servers around
the world exclude access to all of the Usenet context of alt.newsgroups, as well
as excluding as many unmoderated newsgroups as they like, simply because they
can. However, with more and more cloud
based becoming Skynet accessible internet that’s dominated by the likes of
Google, along with everything filtered through Five Eyes PRISM could be
problematic if the wrong people get to monitor as well as pick and choose
whatever we get to see.
Browsers
and specific intranets can provide tightly controlled page context that’s
tailored or filtered to individual clients.
In other words, whatever you get to see is not necessarily going to be
the same as others get to see, and from time to time the clouds of Google and
Bing servers have slipped up by allowing us to see how easily devious and/or
obfuscation worthy they’ve become at topic specific moderators and/or highly
selective kill-switch usage.
Once
key words or phrases are placed into their NO FLY or kill-switch database,
along with another list of clients they wish to affect, and it becomes hopeless
to obtain the same information as others get to see. This technological wizard of Oz phase is going to become quite
essential as the oligarch/Bilderberg N.W.O. takes affect, and even those we’ve
elected or having appointed are suddenly powerless because they’re not in
charge of the cloud.
During
the brief selective search outage associated with the missing context of those
Sirius stars, whereas all the indexed links as having appeared as indexed
normally and otherwise other sorts of internet searches and links to their
respective webpages were accessible and running without issue. In other words, this was clearly a
kill-switch test run, as selected upon blocking and/or excluding access to
specific webpages associated with just those Sirius stars, as pages contributed
from allover the world were no longer responding with anything except the
following generic message:
"Oops! Google Chrome could not
find"
On
another computer running W8 and a Bing search got the exact same error message
upon accessing all sorts of Sirius star related webpages, while all other
webpages were still up and accessible (unaffected by the Sirius kill-switch).
Searching
for webpage context of Sirius that wasn’t related to those two stars was
working normally.
No doubt, Five Eyes PRISM has many alternative uses for
their quantum computers, especially when killing public access to selective
webpages and otherwise for selective clients is so effective and easily
accomplished with little or no forensic trace.
Even if this was an innocent programming error or glitch on
the part of what internet servers are capable of, is still proof as to how the
information highway can be selectively diverted in order to suit whomever is in
charge.
“whoever controls the past, controls the future” / 1984
George Orwell
Everything available to us is from the past, so having the
ultimate control of this past is essential to those which intend to be in
charge regardless of whomever we elect or appoint. In another decade or so, public libraries will become forced into
being cloud based, with hard copies printed on the spot instead of housing the
inventory of actual books, magazines, journals and the like. The space and energy savings as well as the
environmental benefits will be a good thing, but only as long as everyone has
access to the exact same material with no exceptions or client/topic specific
kill-switches.
Obviously the likes of China and North Korea have specific
guidelines that Google and others must follow, which means they have had the
ability to selectively divert and/or obfuscate as much as it takes in order to
satisfy those in charge. Nowadays the
quantum supercomputers of Five Eyes and PRISM could become the ultimate
all-knowing cloud, but should we trust this cloud?
Google Groups Usenet Newsgroups is dysfunctional because:
Google
Groups version of Usenet Newsgroups is perhaps just too public and
unmoderated to suit those of PRISM and their Five Eyes peers pulling our civilian and government strings.
Of course other internet browsers even tend to automatically filter out
or moderate whatever I might have to say, by keeping the search index
from placing any of my topics and replies anywhere near the top of the stack.
With
so much going rather badly or simply wrong for us nowadays, it's
looking as though the Rothschilds and their devout Qinetiq(MI6/CIA)
FUD-masters have the vast majority of us snookered and dumbfounded past
the point of no return, as well as their FUD keeping us scared to death
of our own shadows, plus no question that absolute silence from team
Google means they are equally in on it, or at least being told to keep
quiet or else.
First
of all, 99.9% of Americans do not even know that Usenet/newsgroups is
even available as a global public network of mostly unmoderated and
independent (aka free speech) news and information that they can read as well as interact with, and of those 0.1% there’s less than 0.1% of them that are
actively utilizing Usenet/newsgroups (that’s roughly one individual out of a
million, such as 330 Americans or perhaps merely 7000 individuals world wide). By
way of keeping Google Groups version of accessing Usenet/newsgroups
dysfunctional is a very essential test or dry-run of any future NWO or
OWG command, and it's certainly what Hitler and his mafia cabal of ZNRs
would have been doing).
The new and improved Google+ version of Usenet/newsgroup access is actually somewhat less functional than the basic HTTP version which runs at least four times faster than Groups+.
For some unexplained reason(s), perhaps other than mainstream status-quo damage control, it seems from time to time our Google Groups version of using Usenet/newsgroups is still being extensively foiled by insiders constantly posting volumes of their bogus topics and otherwise of newsgroups constantly traumatized by their policy of topic/author stalking as well as hijacking of our topics in order to suit their own agenda, and/or by those of sufficiently protected special-interest groups (many of them faith-based) that perceive having everything they value put at risk. So, in addition to this private investigative method and those of using Usenet/newsgroup publishing, I may have to resort to a few other social media tactics of returning the favor with all the love and affection I can muster, as for continued publishing and promoting on behalf of sharing whatever my research and subsequent topics are all about.
The new and improved Google+ version of Usenet/newsgroup access is actually somewhat less functional than the basic HTTP version which runs at least four times faster than Groups+.
For some unexplained reason(s), perhaps other than mainstream status-quo damage control, it seems from time to time our Google Groups version of using Usenet/newsgroups is still being extensively foiled by insiders constantly posting volumes of their bogus topics and otherwise of newsgroups constantly traumatized by their policy of topic/author stalking as well as hijacking of our topics in order to suit their own agenda, and/or by those of sufficiently protected special-interest groups (many of them faith-based) that perceive having everything they value put at risk. So, in addition to this private investigative method and those of using Usenet/newsgroup publishing, I may have to resort to a few other social media tactics of returning the favor with all the love and affection I can muster, as for continued publishing and promoting on behalf of sharing whatever my research and subsequent topics are all about.
Btw; whenever
Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups becomes dysfunctional and no
sign of recovery, at least my "Google-Usenet" and "Guth-Usenet"
accounts are each fully functional and for the moment they remain open
to the public.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”Did I just break our Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups?
Once again, shortly after having posted alternative links to earthquake prediction pages, such as those of E.D.G. eq-forecasting, everything comes down to a halt. At least the index updating function of Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups is dysfunctional.
At times Google Groups version of Usenet seems rather broken or dead, as having been accepting our contributions but then it’s not updating itself in order to display any current index our replies, as though it has turned itself into a somewhat dysfunctional Usenet/newsgroup black hole.
Since my “Guth Usenet” and the new "Google Usenet" accounts are still up and working like a charm and public accessible for anyone to contribute and read whatever updates, must mean that those individuals or special interest groups (usually faith-based and redneck ZNR/GOP FUD-master types) in charge of whatever the general public and media get to read of Usenet/newsgroups, is once again being intentionally terminated or simply as having been diverted or hacked to death in order to accomplish the task of mainstream damage-control.
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
Obviously it’s not any local problem with my computer or that of its crappy Centurylink DSL provider, and obviously it’s not any Google Groups glitch if my personal stuff including “Guth Usenet” and "Google Usenet" are still working while all other public and moderated newsgroup stuff isn’t. Clearly Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups has been compromised and/or is being intentionally hacked to death.
I had only recently replaced the “uk.media.newspapers” newsgroup with “sci.astro.ccd-imaging”, so perhaps that’s where things got all screwed up, because that newsgroup has summarily died with my topic being stuck at the top of its newsgroup page. Otherwise it’s not my fault that my Google Groups account had once been showing 37000+ views of my topics and replies per week should be causing such problems, unless my topics and other replies were causing too much drain on the local server bandwidth. Apparently we’ve gotten too close to the Google/NOVA Usenet event horizon, because we’re sucked into its black hole where our stuff goes in, but then noting comes back out.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)