The internet cloud can be unfriendly, and as NO FLY worthy as it gets.
The Sirius Documentary © 2013
Google Groups Usenet Newsgroups is dysfunctional because:
Did I just break our Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups?
Once again, shortly after having posted alternative links to earthquake prediction pages, such as those of E.D.G. eq-forecasting, everything comes down to a halt. At least the index updating function of Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups is dysfunctional.
Sirius stars are currently MIA, as in having been terminated
by the mainstream status-quo.
We seem to have a kill-switch
gap, whereas individuals like myself do not have the same access and freedom of
switching off those topics and authors that piss me off. I want my switch.
As of lately, Wikipedia as
well as several other search links as to those Sirius stars seem to be missing
in action. Searching for
the public science/astronomy material on those Sirius stars, and instead we get
the following:
"Oops! Google Chrome could not find"
"Oops! Google Chrome could not find"
Other than my having included
the mention of Sirius within my recent topics and replies, what's the problem?
Just because those Sirius
stars will get a lot closer before moving off, and possibly Sirius(b) could
pull enough of Sirius(a) plasma to become problematic, is just what binary
stars do (make that trinary if you'd care to include our sun). Of course
if Sirius(b) goes supernova from this distance and closing fast at 7.5 km/sec,
it is most certainly not going to do our planet a whole lot of good.
No telling what the
considerable Sirius Oort cloud of debris and asteroids might have for us, not
to mention its far flung planets.
Pretty much any topic as offering a webpage as having the
context include the word/name Sirius, has been Google and Bing search
terminated. It’s as though our
mainstream media cops are doing everything they can muster at keeping their
status-quo about those Sirius stars from being modified by any outsider like
Greer, because once the door of revising the Bilderberg/oligarch version is
broken open, could allow a flood of other disclosures and revisions.
Has this Sirius documentary become a conspiracy wrapped in a conspiracy?
The Sirius Documentary © 2013
“This website is the
home for the Sirius Documentary. A revolutionary
documentary about the existence of information and technology not available to
the general public”
Apparently
Dr. Steven Greer has been busy creating a wee little problem for the rest of
us.
This is highly reminiscent of how my GuthVenus topics get
treated as though taboo/nondisclosure rated, and this fully proves how fast and
extensive the moderation of our public internet and Usenet/newsgroups can get
diverted and/or terminated at the flip of a switch.
“whoever controls
the past, controls the future” / 1984 George Orwell
"A new scientific
truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the
light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation
grows up that is familiar with it." / Max Planck
Brad Guth,
Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”, GuthVenus
As is, many internet and especially intranet servers around
the world exclude access to all of the Usenet context of alt.newsgroups, as well
as excluding as many unmoderated newsgroups as they like, simply because they
can. However, with more and more cloud
based becoming Skynet accessible internet that’s dominated by the likes of
Google, along with everything filtered through Five Eyes PRISM could be
problematic if the wrong people get to monitor as well as pick and choose
whatever we get to see.
Browsers
and specific intranets can provide tightly controlled page context that’s
tailored or filtered to individual clients.
In other words, whatever you get to see is not necessarily going to be
the same as others get to see, and from time to time the clouds of Google and
Bing servers have slipped up by allowing us to see how easily devious and/or
obfuscation worthy they’ve become at topic specific moderators and/or highly
selective kill-switch usage.
Once
key words or phrases are placed into their NO FLY or kill-switch database,
along with another list of clients they wish to affect, and it becomes hopeless
to obtain the same information as others get to see. This technological wizard of Oz phase is going to become quite
essential as the oligarch/Bilderberg N.W.O. takes affect, and even those we’ve
elected or having appointed are suddenly powerless because they’re not in
charge of the cloud.
During
the brief selective search outage associated with the missing context of those
Sirius stars, whereas all the indexed links as having appeared as indexed
normally and otherwise other sorts of internet searches and links to their
respective webpages were accessible and running without issue. In other words, this was clearly a
kill-switch test run, as selected upon blocking and/or excluding access to
specific webpages associated with just those Sirius stars, as pages contributed
from allover the world were no longer responding with anything except the
following generic message:
"Oops! Google Chrome could not
find"
On
another computer running W8 and a Bing search got the exact same error message
upon accessing all sorts of Sirius star related webpages, while all other
webpages were still up and accessible (unaffected by the Sirius kill-switch).
Searching
for webpage context of Sirius that wasn’t related to those two stars was
working normally.
No doubt, Five Eyes PRISM has many alternative uses for
their quantum computers, especially when killing public access to selective
webpages and otherwise for selective clients is so effective and easily
accomplished with little or no forensic trace.
Even if this was an innocent programming error or glitch on
the part of what internet servers are capable of, is still proof as to how the
information highway can be selectively diverted in order to suit whomever is in
charge.
“whoever controls the past, controls the future” / 1984
George Orwell
Everything available to us is from the past, so having the
ultimate control of this past is essential to those which intend to be in
charge regardless of whomever we elect or appoint. In another decade or so, public libraries will become forced into
being cloud based, with hard copies printed on the spot instead of housing the
inventory of actual books, magazines, journals and the like. The space and energy savings as well as the
environmental benefits will be a good thing, but only as long as everyone has
access to the exact same material with no exceptions or client/topic specific
kill-switches.
Obviously the likes of China and North Korea have specific
guidelines that Google and others must follow, which means they have had the
ability to selectively divert and/or obfuscate as much as it takes in order to
satisfy those in charge. Nowadays the
quantum supercomputers of Five Eyes and PRISM could become the ultimate
all-knowing cloud, but should we trust this cloud?
Google Groups Usenet Newsgroups is dysfunctional because:
Google
Groups version of Usenet Newsgroups is perhaps just too public and
unmoderated to suit those of PRISM and their Five Eyes peers pulling our civilian and government strings.
Of course other internet browsers even tend to automatically filter out
or moderate whatever I might have to say, by keeping the search index
from placing any of my topics and replies anywhere near the top of the stack.
With
so much going rather badly or simply wrong for us nowadays, it's
looking as though the Rothschilds and their devout Qinetiq(MI6/CIA)
FUD-masters have the vast majority of us snookered and dumbfounded past
the point of no return, as well as their FUD keeping us scared to death
of our own shadows, plus no question that absolute silence from team
Google means they are equally in on it, or at least being told to keep
quiet or else.
First
of all, 99.9% of Americans do not even know that Usenet/newsgroups is
even available as a global public network of mostly unmoderated and
independent (aka free speech) news and information that they can read as well as interact with, and of those 0.1% there’s less than 0.1% of them that are
actively utilizing Usenet/newsgroups (that’s roughly one individual out of a
million, such as 330 Americans or perhaps merely 7000 individuals world wide). By
way of keeping Google Groups version of accessing Usenet/newsgroups
dysfunctional is a very essential test or dry-run of any future NWO or
OWG command, and it's certainly what Hitler and his mafia cabal of ZNRs
would have been doing).
The new and improved Google+ version of Usenet/newsgroup access is actually somewhat less functional than the basic HTTP version which runs at least four times faster than Groups+.
For some unexplained reason(s), perhaps other than mainstream status-quo damage control, it seems from time to time our Google Groups version of using Usenet/newsgroups is still being extensively foiled by insiders constantly posting volumes of their bogus topics and otherwise of newsgroups constantly traumatized by their policy of topic/author stalking as well as hijacking of our topics in order to suit their own agenda, and/or by those of sufficiently protected special-interest groups (many of them faith-based) that perceive having everything they value put at risk. So, in addition to this private investigative method and those of using Usenet/newsgroup publishing, I may have to resort to a few other social media tactics of returning the favor with all the love and affection I can muster, as for continued publishing and promoting on behalf of sharing whatever my research and subsequent topics are all about.
The new and improved Google+ version of Usenet/newsgroup access is actually somewhat less functional than the basic HTTP version which runs at least four times faster than Groups+.
For some unexplained reason(s), perhaps other than mainstream status-quo damage control, it seems from time to time our Google Groups version of using Usenet/newsgroups is still being extensively foiled by insiders constantly posting volumes of their bogus topics and otherwise of newsgroups constantly traumatized by their policy of topic/author stalking as well as hijacking of our topics in order to suit their own agenda, and/or by those of sufficiently protected special-interest groups (many of them faith-based) that perceive having everything they value put at risk. So, in addition to this private investigative method and those of using Usenet/newsgroup publishing, I may have to resort to a few other social media tactics of returning the favor with all the love and affection I can muster, as for continued publishing and promoting on behalf of sharing whatever my research and subsequent topics are all about.
Btw; whenever
Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups becomes dysfunctional and no
sign of recovery, at least my "Google-Usenet" and "Guth-Usenet"
accounts are each fully functional and for the moment they remain open
to the public.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”Did I just break our Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups?
Once again, shortly after having posted alternative links to earthquake prediction pages, such as those of E.D.G. eq-forecasting, everything comes down to a halt. At least the index updating function of Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups is dysfunctional.
At times Google Groups version of Usenet seems rather broken or dead, as having been accepting our contributions but then it’s not updating itself in order to display any current index our replies, as though it has turned itself into a somewhat dysfunctional Usenet/newsgroup black hole.
Since my “Guth Usenet” and the new "Google Usenet" accounts are still up and working like a charm and public accessible for anyone to contribute and read whatever updates, must mean that those individuals or special interest groups (usually faith-based and redneck ZNR/GOP FUD-master types) in charge of whatever the general public and media get to read of Usenet/newsgroups, is once again being intentionally terminated or simply as having been diverted or hacked to death in order to accomplish the task of mainstream damage-control.
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/google-usenet/topics?hl=en
Obviously it’s not any local problem with my computer or that of its crappy Centurylink DSL provider, and obviously it’s not any Google Groups glitch if my personal stuff including “Guth Usenet” and "Google Usenet" are still working while all other public and moderated newsgroup stuff isn’t. Clearly Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups has been compromised and/or is being intentionally hacked to death.
I had only recently replaced the “uk.media.newspapers” newsgroup with “sci.astro.ccd-imaging”, so perhaps that’s where things got all screwed up, because that newsgroup has summarily died with my topic being stuck at the top of its newsgroup page. Otherwise it’s not my fault that my Google Groups account had once been showing 37000+ views of my topics and replies per week should be causing such problems, unless my topics and other replies were causing too much drain on the local server bandwidth. Apparently we’ve gotten too close to the Google/NOVA Usenet event horizon, because we’re sucked into its black hole where our stuff goes in, but then noting comes back out.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
